The McKinsey Quarterly

  • Recommend (64)
  • Text Size
  • Print
  • Download PDF
  • Link to This

The value in outsourcing legacy insurance products

Insurers that outsource the IT and administration of policies underwritten years ago can improve customer satisfaction, lower costs, and even reduce capital requirements.

Life insurance is a long-tail business: decades can elapse between the time when a policy is sold and the claim is made. Managing a portfolio of these policies, each with its own approximately 40-year time horizon, can present an operational and IT headache. As more and more policies expire, the overhead and servicing costs for the systems that manage legacy products are spread across a dwindling number of active accounts, driving per-policy administration costs higher. Since insurers are required to book capital reserves against future expenses, those costs and their anticipated increase over time can weigh heavily on the balance sheet.

The outsourcing of “legacy books” (or “closed books,” as they are also called) can provide a big lift to the industry, freeing insurers from managing the processes and IT that support these mature product lines. In addition, engaging providers that specialize in these areas typically yields substantial cost savings and can help insurers lower their capital requirements.

Despite the promise of outsourcing legacy products, the practice has yet to spread beyond the United Kingdom. There, regulatory requirements on the life insurance industry, enacted at the beginning of the decade, put severe pressure on margins and costs. While some insurers sold their legacy books outright, others turned to outsourcing. What began as an effort to relieve a growing administrative burden gained traction as insurers recognized that providers could drive down servicing costs through more efficient processes and better IT integration.

Outside the United Kingdom, however, insurers have remained skittish about handing over a large part of their operations to inexperienced vendors. Likewise, vendors have stayed on the sidelines, wary of investing in an unproven market. That chicken-and-egg dilemma may be about to crack as players in North America and continental Europe, prompted by rising administrative costs and persistently soft insurance markets, consider outsourcing their legacy book management.

Legacy policies: Significant processing and IT costs
 

Servicing legacy books requires significant processing costs and heavy IT support on everything from policy and eligibility reviews to client statements and payouts. The core IT running most insurance processes has grown organically and through acquisitions, leaving insurers to grapple with a tangle of fragmented and outdated applications. The resulting complexity can account for up to 75 percent of the operating and underlying IT costs associated with servicing policies. Best-practice improvements such as process automation, platform consolidation, and data standardization can be difficult and costly to implement across large-scale enterprises. Moreover, such initiatives lie outside an insurer’s core business (see sidebar, “Checklist: Getting started”).

In the cases we’ve seen, companies have achieved significant benefits by offloading this burden to a third party. With legacy book outsourcing, a provider manages the portfolio and all its support systems, including the IT assets, infrastructure, call centers, and support staff. While the insurer owns the customer relationship, the outsourcer assumes the day-to-day administration, such as taking customer calls and issuing statements and payouts. This arrangement enables providers to drive economies of scale in two ways. While an insurer may manage only one or two legacy book portfolios, providers can service several clients at once, spreading fixed costs over a larger volume of policies. Their experience in IT integration, process design, and work flow management means they can better target bottlenecks and inefficiencies. In addition, the greater visibility from streamlined systems helps managers track costs and performance measures more effectively. Together, these improvements typically reduce the total IT and operations cost per policy charged by the provider as much as 50 percent.

Under this arrangement, an insurer pays the outsourcer a fixed price per policy, turning an uncertain operational expense into a guaranteed cost. When talking to regulators, insurers can point to this fixed, lower-cost outsourcing fee to calculate their overall cost position more accurately, potentially reducing the capital reserves associated with legacy books.

In one case, executives at a life insurer asked its chosen outsourcing provider to manage its legacy portfolio. Their goal was to reduce business complexity, improve customer satisfaction, and trim costs. A joint vendor–insurer project team (composed of IT, operations, and business staff) implemented the effort in phases, first defining its scope and then identifying the systems, databases, and operational activities to transfer. The vendor’s mandate also was to improve service levels. It created a performance-management system to allocate resources to areas that had the greatest customer impact. As a result, the vendor reduced the number of customer complaints by 30 percent in four weeks, surpassing the initial target of 20 percent in six weeks. Next, it applied lean-management techniques to smooth process flows and improve transparency—for instance, by using simple imaging solutions to scan documents, thereby cutting down on paperwork and making information more accessible. With those milestones met, the vendor began simplifying the insurer’s IT architecture, trimming the number of platforms to seven (from ten) by merging systems and applications. In all, these actions cut servicing costs per policy by 40 percent.

The path to greater adoption

Unlike other niche outsourcing markets, where small operators can step in as specialists, legacy book outsourcing is a volume business. Therefore, providers must secure a steady stream of new deals to maintain the scale needed to generate savings. They must also be willing to build teams with the ability to run and consolidate legacy insurance IT systems. This dynamic means that players must reach scale fast and establish themselves as leaders to thrive. Since the market leaves no room for second-tier players, even the more successful UK vendors have been reluctant to invest in other regions without some assurance of volume.

A few trends could open up the market significantly. Some vendors, hungry for growth, may pursue legacy outsourcing and its potential global market size of $3 billion to $7 billion as a strategic business opportunity. Alternatively, the magnitude of cost savings that some UK insurers have achieved may spur them to seek the same service for their non-UK operations. Outside investors, such as private-equity firms, might also step in as aggregators to buy legacy portfolios and outsource their management.

Legacy book outsourcing can help insurers respond to the challenges of today’s economic environment. By getting out of the time-consuming and expensive responsibility of managing these slow-growth businesses, insurers can concentrate on pursuing new opportunities with higher returns. This approach can also be applied to other financial-services products, such as mortgages, that require long-term servicing after the primary revenue-generating period has ended.

About the Authors

Matthias Daub is an associate principal in McKinsey’s Frankfurt office, and Ferruccio Lagutaine is a principal in the Zurich office.

Recommend (64)
  • 21 DECEMBER 2010
    Jenny Sutton
    Partner
    The RFP Company
    Hong Kong

    If third parties can lower the cost for closed blocks of business, why aren’t they also being used for current products?

    .
    Jenny Sutton
    Partner
    The RFP Company
    Hong Kong

    If third parties can lower the cost for closed blocks of business, why aren’t they also being used for current products?

    .
  • 12 DECEMBER 2010
    NISHANT JAIN
    Business Process Expert and MBA in Financial Services and Strategy Student
    Schulich School of Business
    Toronto Canada

    ...Further, to Point 2 in the Getting Started Checklist, I elaborate that the insurer must pick a service provider which has significant experience in All of the following practices:...

    .
    NISHANT JAIN
    Business Process Expert and MBA in Financial Services and Strategy Student
    Schulich School of Business
    Toronto Canada

    The article presents a good insight of why the outsourcing of legacy books should be the next step towards maintaining focus on the core active book by the insurer. Rather the same can also be extended to not just the closed books, but to the run-off line of business as well, if the service provider has the requisite domain expertise to manage active policies.

    Further, to Point 2 in the Getting Started Checklist, I elaborate that the insurer must pick a service provider which has significant experience in All of the following practices:

    1) Process re-engineering - Transitioning legacy books can lead to setting new processes and re-vamping existing processes. A provider should have a sound re-engineering experience, backed by a framework. This framework shall help the insurer (client team) to visualize the next steps in this complex process, thereby not leaving much to surprise.

    2) IT capability - Providers must be able to choose the right IT tools (databases, Workflow solutions, etcetera) to install the new process. Providers such as Genpact have tied up with Mastek, to tie their process capabilities with MAstek’s software expertise in the area of Insurance.

    3) Ensuring Data Integrity through well-rounded involvement of all major stakeholders - Provider must have proven expertise in ETL, Data Mining, process improvement, process capability analysis and process performance measurement. Not just business transition and IT managers, but Actuaries should be asked to play an important role. Actuaries of the corresponding line of business, should validate the migrated data for correctness to ensure Data Integrity at each step of the migration process. Moreover, if the vendor’s transition managers are also aquainted with insurance domain knowledge and statistical tools such as Six Sigma, they will be able to communicate better with Actuaries and measure quality at each step. All this leading to Zero-surprises at each level.

    4) Choosing the right destination, and Solid Hiring and Training Framework - To ensure business continuity provider must have a streamlined hiring process. Most BPO destinations are fraught with high attrition levels, so selecting the right outsourcing destination is the key, where attrition and hiring can be easily manged. Level of Business Continuity required by the insurer should help decide on these factors. Provider must also have a structured framework to train the agents (data processors) on the basics of insurance. Insurance is a pretty niche domain, training is a must, and ubiquitous F&A know-how can’t be depended upon.

    At this stage of Strategic Decision making of whether to outsource, I am not trying to delve into Operational details, but the objective is simply to make the reader cognizant of the most critical parameters before chosing the right vendor. And as expressed by the author as the ‘chicken and egg syndrome’, the decision to outsource or not should depend on being able to identify the right vendor.

    .
  • 7 DECEMBER 2010
    Orlando Rodriguez
    Managing Director
    Golden Bright International
    Hong Kong

    ...Using outsourcing of policy admin functions to achieve cost reduction and increase quality of service may be possible for a few companies, but it is certainly a very risky and unprofitable strategy for many others.

    .
    Orlando Rodriguez
    Managing Director
    Golden Bright International
    Hong Kong

    I am a frequent reader of your articles and so far very happy with your quality, nevertheless in this case I have to say that this article lacks the usual rigor and comprehensiveness that is the norm in many of your publications.

    Please find below some comments and observations:

    1. The article lacks statistics and reliable evidence to support the potential benefits of outsourcing the policy administration functions.

    2. The article’s assumptions about the average time horizon of life policies is wrong for most markets, although the life insurance business is certainly a long tail one—the average duration of a life policy is around 10 years and not the 40-year horizon indicated in the article.

    3. In many countries, the customer interaction with the company takes place on average around 3 times per year and not at the end of the policy term, even more as riders and investment features are frequently included in the life insurance products, the customer interaction with the life insurer is in a increasing trend, requiring the life insurer to build competitive advantage by managing its customer interaction as a key business function.

    4. Especially in markets where the direct sales force is a major distribution channel, the policy replacement ratio tends to be high, making the average policy duration significantly below the expected term. This creates a wide range of profitability and customer service issues that need to be managed with special attention, not as a commodity.

    5. Outsourcing the policy administration functions may reduce the flexibility and responsiveness of the insurance company to address the ever-changing business environment, making it more difficult to keep a close and accurate reading of the customer needs and interaction preferences.

    6. Using outsourcing of policy admin functions to achieve cost reduction and increase quality of service may be possible for a few companies, but it is certainly a very risky and unprofitable strategy for many others.

    .
Submit Your Comments

The user information you enter into this form will not update your site profile. To update your profile, please visit your profile page.

Subject The value in outsourcing legacy insurance products

*Required

We may publish your comments online and in the print edition of McKinsey Quarterly. Those chosen, which may be edited for length and clarity, will appear along with your name and details, but not your e-mail address. We will use your e-mail address only to send you a confirmation copy of your comments and to notify you if we publish them online.

We value your feedback and will consider it carefully. Nonetheless, we receive so many comments that we cannot acknowledge all of them.

See also:
Preview

Embed E-mail