The McKinsey Quarterly

  • Recommend (54)
  • Text Size
  • Print
  • Download PDF
  • Link to This

The great rebalancing

As the center of economic growth shifts from developed to developing countries, global companies should focus on innovation to win in low-cost, high-growth countries. Their survival elsewhere may depend on it.

The vibrancy of emerging-market growth will not be the only major disruption reshaping the global economy in the next ten years, but it may prove the most profound. This decade will mark the tipping point in a fundamental long-term economic rebalancing that will likely leave traditional Western economies with a lower share of global GDP in 2050 than they had in 1700.

Two socioeconomic movements are under way.

  • Declining dependency ratios. Virtually all major emerging markets are undergoing demographic shifts that historically have unleashed dynamic economic change: simultaneous labor force growth and rapidly declining birthrates. Simply put, there will be more workers, with fewer mouths to feed, leaving more disposable income.
  • The largest urban migration in history. Each week, nearly one-and-a-half-million people move to cities, almost all in developing markets. The economic impact: dramatic gains in output per worker as people move off subsistence farms and into urban jobs. China and India are seeing labor productivity grow at more than five times the rate of most Western countries as traditionally agrarian economies become manufacturing and service powerhouses.

These same factors powered Western economic growth for the better part of two centuries. (And they should last well into the next decade—at least until China’s population, finally seeing the full effects of the one-child policy, begins to go gray.)

In the next decade, emerging-market economies will rapidly evolve from being peripheral players, largely reacting to events set in motion by wealthy Western nations, into powerful economic actors in their own right. They will shed their role as suppliers of low-cost goods and services—the world’s factory—to become large-scale providers of capital, talent, and innovation. (One hint of what’s to come: the number of BRIC1 companies on the Fortune 500 has more than doubled in the past four years alone.)

Nor is this trend just about China and India. To varying degrees, ASEAN,2 Latin American, and Eastern European nations, as well as portions of the Middle East and North Africa, are taking part in this economic renaissance. Even pockets of sub-Saharan Africa now demonstrate vigor after decades of stagnation.

For all companies—both established multinationals and emerging-market challengers—this great rebalancing will force major adjustments in strategic focus. No longer can established companies treat emerging markets as a sideshow. Emerging markets will increasingly become the locus of growth in consumption, production, and—most of all—innovation. More and more, global leadership will depend on winning in the emerging markets first.

Opportunity and adversity are the mothers of invention—emerging markets will be the world’s next fount of innovation

Consider that more than 70 million people are crossing the threshold to the middle class each year, virtually all in emerging economies. By the end of the decade, roughly 40 percent of the world’s population will have achieved middle-class status by global standards, up from less than 20 percent today. This means opportunity in consumer markets: P&G, for example, hopes to add a billion new customers to its ranks in the next decade, adding to the nearly four billion the company touches today. In recent quarterly earnings reports, nearly every global consumer products company—from Kraft to Nestlé—noted upticks in profits, driven primarily by unexpected gains in emerging markets.

tata


The $2,200 Nano car, made by India’s Tata Motors, is just one among hundreds of new products that can turn traditional price and cost structures on their heads.

Seizing that opportunity won’t be easy. These new consumers come from a bewildering array of ethnic and cultural backgrounds. They have little loyalty to—or even knowledge of—established global brands. Their tastes and preferences will evolve just as rapidly, if not more so, than those of consumers in developed markets, and they will demand products with every bit as much quality. Yet, on average, they will wield just 15 percent of the spending power, in real dollars, of their developed-world counterparts.

Companies that can reduce cost structures to 20 or 30 percent of developed-world levels, or lower, will be in position to ride a swelling wave of unmet demand. While much has been made of the Nano, Tata’s $2,200 car, the truth is that hundreds of products now being developed promise to reinvent price and cost structures radically—from Hindustan Lever’s $43 water purifier, in use in more than three million Indian homes, to the Zero, a proxy ATM that costs less than $50 a month to operate (essentially a revamped cell phone with an attached fingerprint scanner, used by local merchants).

To tap the riches rising from these new markets, established organizations must reinvent business models. Hindustan Lever, for example, unable to find reliable distribution in large reaches of India, uses everything from bicycles to bullock carts to deliver products to market. When the Indian refrigerator manufacturer Godrej decided to release a refrigerator for the rural market, it worked with villagers to codesign a product that worked for their needs. The result: the ChotuKool, a $69 fridge that not only shattered price barriers but also included features that allow it to work in an environment where consumers cannot depend on their electricity to stay on.

Today’s unit share leaders will be tomorrow’s revenue winners—ignore them at your peril

Thanks to a low price structure, such innovations capture massive unit share long before they generate meaningful revenue share. This distinction matters. CEOs who miss it risk being overtaken by low-cost innovators that race up the value chain until they have a commanding lead.

Caterpillar, for example, is the world’s largest construction-equipment manufacturer. Its revenues are twice those of the next-largest player. No Chinese company makes the top ten by this measure, so China might appear to be a distant threat. But unit sales numbers tell a different story. Ranked by the number of vehicles sold, 9 of the industry’s 12 largest manufacturers of wheel loaders—the second-largest-selling piece of construction equipment—are Chinese. Nor do these players have an advantage only in their home market: Chinese manufacturers now supply a third of the wheel-loader volume in emerging markets outside China and are beginning to hit their stride in developed markets too. No wonder traditional industry leaders, including Cat, have raced to get a piece of the action, rushing to forge joint ventures with Chinese competitors.

L'Occitane Hong Kong


Even luxury brands such as L’Occitane appeal to consumers in emerging markets—the French company’s fastest-growing segment. It is floating its upcoming IPO on the Hong Kong exchange rather than the Euronext.

Significantly, while emerging-market upstarts often gain market share by trading away margin to build position, that is not always the case. The best, forced to innovate by the harsh conditions of their home markets, are developing leaner business models that both boost low-cost demand and deliver enviable financial returns.

Consider Bharti Airtel, India’s leading wireless provider. In 2003, Bharti founder Sunil Mittal, struggling to hire telecommunications engineers and build out a network fast enough to keep pace with exploding demand for mobile services, made a controversial decision to outsource the construction and management of Bharti’s wireless network to Ericsson and Siemens. The result, a fundamentally new approach to managing a mobile-services company, allows Bharti to reap profit margins higher than most Western telecommunications companies do—despite average revenues per user just 10 to 15 percent of those of its developed-world counterparts.

The allure of emerging-market consumers touches even luxury companies. The privately held French beauty products company L’Occitane, for example, is floating its upcoming IPO not on the Euronext, in Paris, but rather on the exchange in Hong Kong. The reason: emerging-market consumers are the fastest-growing segment for this affordable luxury brand.

Don’t assume that emerging markets are just a cost play—technological innovation will be the next frontier

Last year marked the first ever when an emerging-market company—the Chinese telecom manufacturer Huawei—led the world in patent applications. No US company made the top ten. An imperfect measure? Perhaps, but it captures a deep underlying trend. Today, India supplies more technology workers than any other country, and China is on track to pass the United States as the home of the world’s largest R&D workforce. As more and more talent centers spring up across emerging markets and skills deepen, new innovation ecosystems will emerge. Already, more than 1,000 multinational companies operate R&D facilities in China, five times the level a decade ago.

In electronics, computing, and clean energy, among other fields, emerging-market companies increasingly define the future. Huawei, long dismissed as a perennially weak upstart to the likes of Cisco Systems or Ericsson, is now the world’s third-largest telecom-equipment manufacturer and builds some of the most sophisticated network equipment anywhere. It counts nearly every leading telecom operator as a customer.

Learn to manage multiple business models—or why the West still matters

For established Western multinationals, the biggest dilemma will be figuring out how to thrive while competing across highly different types of markets. Since both developed and emerging markets require innovation at breakneck speed, many companies may be tempted to underinvest in potential long-term revenue growth in new markets in order to pursue here-and-now profit gains in established ones. That’s understandable: while more than 50 percent of future global growth will occur in emerging markets—and in many industries much more than that—the lion’s share of profits so far remains in the OECD. But that’s shortsighted. Companies need to figure out how to win in both.

The mobile-phone handset market epitomizes the paradox: cutting-edge smartphones make up just 6 percent of global handset volumes, yet Apple, Research in Motion (RIM), and HTC now earn more than 50 percent of total industry profits. On the lower end, ultra-low-cost handsets from OEM manufacturers such as TCL and ZTE are capturing significant volume share in emerging markets. Traditional players such as Motorola, Nokia, and Samsung find themselves squeezed in the middle, fending off assaults on both top and bottom—largely from competitors that barely registered less than five years ago. Managing multiple business models is hard.

Blowback is real—so why not drive it yourself?

A few innovative companies are starting to get it right. GE, for example, has devised an electrocardiograph machine for the Indian market that can be sold profitably for $1,500, less than a fifth of the price of traditional ECG monitors in Europe and the United States. The new model has helped GE not only to extend a new level of health care to millions of Indians but also to figure out how to create a monitor it could sell for $2,500 in developed markets. Based on this experience and others like it, GE is now developing more than 25 percent of its new health care products in India—with explicit plans to deploy them both in emerging and advanced economies.

Brazil Walmart


Shoppers in São Paulo, Brazil—just one country where investments by companies based in developed markets have spurred an “innovation blowback” in developing ones: the emergence of lower-priced, high-quality products that raise the stakes for global competition.

The prospect of this innovation wave unleashed by the great rebalancing should serve as a wake-up call to any CEO. Emerging markets are more than enormous growth opportunities; they are where tomorrow’s champions will hone their long-term competitiveness. Pursuing incremental product line extensions in developed markets, though profitable in the short run, will not suffice to build the critical muscle required. Innovation “blowback” is coming as lower-priced, high-quality products created for the mass markets of tomorrow move from the developing to the developed world. Buoyed by strengthening currencies and improved balance sheets, emerging-market challengers will move further up the value chain by acquiring more Western companies. Learning to win in low-cost, high-growth countries means winning not just there but everywhere.

About the Authors

Peter Bisson is a director in McKinsey’s Stamford office, and Elizabeth Stephenson is a principal in the Chicago office; Rik Kirkland is McKinsey’s director of publishing.


The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Patrick Viguerie to the development of this article.

Notes

1 Brazil, Russia, India, and China. The term BRIC is often used as a proxy for fast-growing emerging markets in general.

2 Association of South East Asian Nations.

Recommend (54)
  • 23 SEPTEMBER 2010
    Karthik Nagendra
    Manager- Thought leadership marketing
    Wipro Technologies
    Bangalore, India

    ...The emerging economies have done well to survive and thrive during the recent economic downturn due to the sheer spirit of innovation—innovations that are done at a quarter of the costs of developed economies....

    .
    Karthik Nagendra
    Manager- Thought leadership marketing
    Wipro Technologies
    Bangalore, India

    Reverse innovation will be the next big defining aspect in the history of global business. The emerging economies have done well to survive and thrive during the recent economic downturn due to the sheer spirit of innovation—innovations that are done at a quarter of the costs of developed economies. This has not only made these innovations reachable to the masses but also it has opened up possibilities for taking these innovations to the developed economies at a lesser cost than their current manufacturing costs. This trend is only going to increase in the next decade with the balance now shifting towards Asia.

    .
  • 31 JULY 2010
    Kenneth Armitage
    Lt Commander
    Suffolk, East Anglia, England

    ...Back in the 1980s it was suggested all jobs in advanced industrial nations in the future would require degree-level qualifications. But with more and more gaining a degree of sorts, the cost of education has increased...

    .
    Kenneth Armitage
    Lt Commander
    Suffolk, East Anglia, England

    The ‘American Dream’ began to disappear 30 years ago with a change in political, economic and social policies driven by the greed of a few who dreamt up the notion of ‘trickle-down’ economics which suggested if you taxed the rich even less they would spend more and eventually some of that money would trickle down to the lower levels in society. That notion is bunkum and for the last 3 decades money has flowed upwards and not downwards; as the renowned Canadian-born US economist John Kenneth Galbraith said, when referring to ‘trickle-down economics, “The less than elegant metaphor that if one feeds the horse enough oats, some will pass through to the road for the sparrows.”

    What happened in the USA, and to an extent in the UK, is an inverse pyramid where the incomes of the top 10% have at least doubled and the incomes of the top 1% have tripled, the pay of those in the middle 30% has increased by 20 to 30% but the pay of the bottom 60% has stagnated keeping pace with inflation or has fallen; 30 years ago the pay of the chief executive or managing director was in the order of 20 to 30 times the pay of the lowest paid worker, now it is more like 200 to 300 times the pay of the lowest paid worker. This is one of the reasons why, in addition to the recession that started in early 2007, the US housing market stagnated, began to fall, and is still falling. A similar situation exists in the UK but it is being propped up by the public sector most of whom have received pay increases above the rate of inflation for the last 5 to 10 years, and by the various over-generous social handout schemes such as the child allowance, child tax credits, tax credits, working tax credits, and other allowances and expenses such as unemployment benefits, housing costs, and the iniquitous council tax paid by the government through taxation.

    The gradual economic decline, over there and over here, has been exacerbated by the loss of millions, even tens of millions, of jobs being outsourced or exported, with the growth of globalization, that shifted business, industry and manufacturing from west to east followed by a shift in economic strength and gradually political power.

    Back in the 1980s it was suggested all jobs in advanced industrial nations in the future would require degree-level qualifications. But with more and more gaining a degree of sorts, the cost of education has increased such that students in the USA and the UK now leave after 3 or 4 years with an enormous debt burden around their necks. The loss of industrial and manufacturing jobs means more graduates are not walking into jobs that require higher qualifications but having to accept anything they can get and that is because a company does not consist of 50% managers and 50% workers but nearer 10% managers and 90% workers; and, provided people can afford it, there will be an increasing need for people with vocational and professional qualifications in the service industry sector, health, beauty, and care givers.

    .
  • 2 JULY 2010
    Abhishek Kumar
    Product Manager
    Manipal Press Ltd.
    Manipal, Karnataka, India

    ...the real needs of these people can be understood only if companies invlove them in their product development or concept development....

    .
    Abhishek Kumar
    Product Manager
    Manipal Press Ltd.
    Manipal, Karnataka, India

    There are innovations in terms of products being used for a purpose other than the ones they were designed for. For example, a washing machine being used for churning the curd to make it Lassi, a healthy drink used by common man in states of punjab and haryana in India. Another example: using cycle paddle and fan blades over a boat to use it as propeller by a common man who faced problem in crossing a river daily where there was no proper bridge over it in north part of state bihar in India. There are many such examples, which show that the real needs of these people can be understood only if companies invlove them in their product development or concept development. This can be only achieved if companies are ready to reach them and understand them and make them part of their product development cycle team at various stages.

    The companies also need to think in terms of reaching out to these customers and providing them solutions at their place in a decentralised manner rather than producing it centrally and distributing it uneconomically to far and wide places. For example, two students from a foreign university designed a chilling plant running with the help of solar cells, for the milk producers in a western state of India, Goa. This has helped these milk producers to preserve their products until they are collected by a company van for processing. A similar need is there for grains to be stored for months together without using electricity supplied by the grid which either has not reached in the hinterland or even if electric wires have reached but electricity reaches only for few hours in a day.

    Hence, decentralization of services is the key in such cases. Similar innovation is required in a decentralized manner to preserve the vegetables and fruits which grow in the hinterland and get destroyed before they reach the market, as it takes a lot of time to transport these. There is a company started by three individuals who provide fresh drinking water to the villagers for the nominal charges in their villages by setting up and maintaining a low-cost water purification plant. Such a decentralised way of providing services at nominal cost is possible because these companies use the resources available in the vicinity, train the local guys to maintain them, and use the latest technical know how. They also avoid any transportation or transmission charges in such cases. In fact, a lot of opportunities are there in such services in developing countries like providing electricity, health care, education, safe drinking water, and even water for the purpose of cultivation backed by water harvesting and optimal usage of the water know how.

    .
Submit Your Comments

The user information you enter into this form will not update your site profile. To update your profile, please visit your profile page.

Subject The great rebalancing

*Required

We may publish your comments online and in the print edition of McKinsey Quarterly. Those chosen, which may be edited for length and clarity, will appear along with your name and details, but not your e-mail address. We will use your e-mail address only to send you a confirmation copy of your comments and to notify you if we publish them online.

We value your feedback and will consider it carefully. Nonetheless, we receive so many comments that we cannot acknowledge all of them.

See also:
Preview

Special Package

Global forces: Five crucibles of innovation shaping global business

This article is part of a package based on a major McKinsey research effort dedicated to spotting the trends that will define the business landscape of the coming era. The initiative identified five forces, or "crucibles," of innovation where the tensions will be greatest—and the opportunities for smart strategy the most promising. To read a primer on the research or explore the other forces, please select from the following.

Embed E-mail