The McKinsey Quarterly

  • Recommend (74)
  • Text Size
  • Print
  • Download PDF
  • Link to This

Reshaping IT management for turbulent times

A new model for managing IT combines factory-style productivity to keep costs down with a more nimble, innovation-focused approach to adapt to rapid change.

Despite decades of increasingly intensive use of information across industries, IT has remained a black box for many executives. Too often, the link between spending and performance has been unclear, if not problematic. As a result, leaders felt that their only course of action was to hire a competent CIO, throw increasing amounts of money at IT, and hope for the best. The economic disruptions of recent years, however, have tightened budgets and placed a premium on action, forcing companies to rethink IT’s fundamental role.

In most organizations, IT began as a support function, leading to a one-dimensional management approach. However, technology-enabled products, interactive communications, and an “always on” information environment have thrust IT to the forefront, with critical implications for business growth and customer engagement. In addition, established practices, such as lean-management techniques, have highlighted the value of IT in reducing waste and increasing productivity.

This deeper recognition of IT’s potential has given rise to a new management model consisting of two categories: “Factory IT” and “Enabling IT.” Factory IT encompasses the bulk of an organization’s IT activities, applying lessons from the production floor—scale, standardization, and simplification—to drive efficiency, optimize delivery, and lower unit costs. Enabling IT is focused on helping organizations respond more effectively to changing business needs and gain a competitive advantage by spurring innovation and growth.

This approach goes beyond simply relabeling functions to include broader leadership, governance, and organizational changes, and IT leaders will need very different skills to manage each model. Business leaders will have to engage with IT in new ways. For instance, while IT standardization and consolidation increase responsiveness, speed to market, and cost effectiveness, managers may have fewer options to customize solutions. Likewise, more transparency and better metrics may come at the expense of unrestricted choice for configuration and architecture. In return, business leaders would get a new type of IT partner to support innovation, with skills to deliver IT-enabled capabilities quickly that drive both top- and bottom-line growth. But they’ll need to treat such IT staff as full members of their group, offering incentives and rewards for exceptional performance.

Factory IT: More efficient IT services

The core elements of the typical IT function have changed radically over the past decade, and this evolution has enabled the Factory model. Ten years ago, a company might have felt compelled to create its own software to manage the supply chain and other activities; today, many configurable products can meet those needs. Similarly, expensive, single-purpose servers and the dedicated support staff they require can be replaced by commodity servers, often managed from half a world away.

Moreover, these standardized platforms can now be coupled with mature processes for managing broad swaths of IT, including basic infrastructure and many of the business applications. Under this configuration, IT activities can be restructured and continually improved much as any other business process, using a combination of lean techniques, automation, and outsourcing or cloud computing to drive down costs and improve quality. Results from our latest technology survey1 demonstrate how companies have already begun to implement some of these practices (Exhibit 1).

There are three key components of the Factory model:

Industrialized IT—applying traditional business-management techniques to IT

Standardization decreases the resources and specialized development needed to support IT, allowing organizations to apply proven management methods from large industrial settings to reduce IT costs. Lean-management techniques have evolved well beyond manufacturing and are applicable to the types of skilled services found in IT. A company can typically create 20 to 30 percent or more in additional IT capacity by streamlining processes, automating routine functions, and eliminating redundancy. Major sources of IT waste include unnecessary functionality (for example, gold-plated systems with extra, noncore functions), work flow bottlenecks caused by inadequate cross-training, and frequent rework from bugs or constantly changing requirements.

Companies can benefit significantly by replacing customized systems with highly standardized offerings (for example, a Web server or e-mail platform that includes common hardware, applications, and support levels) and service catalogs (essentially à la carte menus that specify the cost of each service). These improvements increase cost transparency and highlight clear opportunities for further efficiency while also giving individual business units the freedom to customize certain features and functions.

Organizations should also recognize that not all processes have equal value and should set service and support levels accordingly. For instance, one bank applied the same exacting levels of support and performance for its critical core banking applications to an in-house employee service portal. By increasing the service portal’s allowable downtime to five days a year, from just five hours, the bank saved hundreds of thousands of dollars in hardware, software, and staff expense.

In our experience, these measures often double workforce productivity by redeploying or reducing staff. A standardized IT environment also allows companies to select from a wider array of vendors whose scale and skills can further reduce costs and improve delivery. In addition, by avoiding customized hardware and operating systems, companies can more readily take advantage of a technology cost curve that has been dropping by 4 to 5 percent annually.

Flexible IT factories—building IT that’s more responsive to changing business conditions

IT tends to operate on a very long-term investment cycle consisting of large, multiyear projects, extended outsourcing deals, and durable infrastructure assets. As the pace of business change accelerates and organizations respond to shifting market conditions or more frequent M&A, IT leaders are often constrained by these investments. IT departments are starting to adapt in two ways:

The cloud: Cloud computing offers access to information, processing, and storage through the network or an external service provider. This mode of delivery allows companies to purchase computer processing as a service, rather than making up-front investments in IT capacity and in-house support staff. The New York Times, for example, digitized and catalogued more than 100 years of archived articles for its Web site in a 24-hour period by using Amazon.com’s cloud offering, avoiding the need to configure and operate a set of servers for a onetime effort.

Agile software development. IT programmers are flocking to approaches that emphasize the very fast, iterative development of systems through close interactions with users, allowing continual feedback and programming refinement. This agility can deliver new systems and capabilities in a matter of weeks or months instead of years. A frequent iteration cycle also keeps IT developers and business users in sync on requirements and priorities. Agile development may not be right for every project. However, since this approach is most effective when business needs are shifting, it is gaining favor among many IT departments.

Together, the cloud and agility can make the IT factory more nimble, with lower costs and faster delivery.

Holistic business cases—cutting complexity through improved planning

For most companies, IT complexity increases gradually, as systems slowly evolve beyond their initial purpose, or through acquisitions, when new, sometimes duplicative systems are built for individual business units. Performance suffers over time, as ineffective IT slows product introductions, hampers customer interactions, and often makes postmerger integration more difficult.

IT leaders recognize the adverse effects of complexity, but replacing these systems involves a substantial commitment of resources: hardware, new applications, and staff and vendor time. The economics are difficult to justify given the short time horizons of many tough-minded CFOs, particularly since tangible benefits are often realized only in the longer term.

To manage complexity, companies are starting to employ a more holistic business case model that goes beyond the traditional, IT-centric versions. This model includes realistic, verifiable cost–benefit analysis to assess the impact of new systems on the entire organization. Critically, such plans also require a road map for how future projects might build on the investment. At one company, for instance, the business case to deliver a unified view of all customer data showed how better information management could enable follow-on projects for marketing systems, enhancing cross-selling opportunities.

 

The benefits of these business cases are twofold. First, they ensure that the simplification of processes and systems is a starting point for new project investments. Second, better visibility can show how seemingly small IT projects can deliver a high return on investment by improving standardization and service levels across the entire business (see sidebar “Implementing Factory IT”).

Enabling IT: Supporting innovation and delivering business value

As the market-facing complement to the Factory model, Enabling IT focuses on creating new sources of value. This emphasis on innovation requires three things: ready access to relevant information, a willingness to test and learn, and close collaboration. Enabling IT supports these activities by developing the processes and technologies to launch a new sales channel, design a tech-enabled product feature, or increase customer retention through online offerings.

Where Factory IT is housed centrally, Enabling IT’s employees function as an IT SWAT team for new initiatives or business imperatives and are often closely integrated with—or even embedded in—business units. The performance of these employees is rated on metrics such as responsiveness and flexibility rather than on their ability to deliver low unit costs. And where Factory IT focuses on long-term projects and on-time delivery, Enabling IT is typified by rapid prototyping and iterative development. Our survey results show that companies deploy Enabling IT to support innovation and growth in three ways (Exhibit 2):

Turning raw data into insight

The increasing volume of data is taxing the ability of companies to track, filter, and analyze information and turn it into useful, actionable insights. Organizations that build effective information systems can take advantage of emerging opportunities and respond more quickly to unseen market changes. With the rise of electronic health records and prescription data, for example, pharmaceutical companies need systems to structure and mine this information for trends on patient compliance or drug efficacy.

Resolving these issues requires a cross-functional group of IT experts, statistical analysts, and business leaders. IT must develop new technical capabilities to manage the massive amount of information, and IT leaders will need to collaborate more closely with management teams to extract its full value.

Supporting rapid experimentation

Where lean manufacturing and Factory IT seek to avoid errors, Enabling IT’s mind-set tolerates (and even encourages) the mistakes that result from experimentation and iteration as long as they happen quickly, the outcomes are measured, and the lessons are incorporated into the team’s thinking. More companies are embracing rapid experimentation as a way to develop, refine, and upgrade their services or products. Capital One and Google, for example, have been at the forefront of this trend with their credit cards and online services, respectively. That wave is spreading to traditional players: P&G’s Vocalpoint, a network of mothers, provides feedback on new product ideas. Similarly, a leading fast-food company is using IT systems and analytics at test sites to gauge the impact of new menu choices on store-level revenue, operations, and customer experience.

Such experimentation requires the right set of technical capabilities and a flexible IT environment. Managers must employ tools to define, build, test, and improve new products quickly, integrating feedback from both internal stakeholders and a set of users or customers. Responsive IT support is a vital component of this effort. By assembling a team to work hand in hand with the managers on these new business offerings, IT provides essential support to help build and modify business processes and systems rapidly.

Web 2.0—fostering new interaction models

IT has historically focused on automating high-velocity transactions for enterprise resource planning (ERP), supply chains, and customer relationship management (CRM). That focus is now shifting to lightweight Web 2.0 tools2 to support the more diverse transactions and more complex interactions that shape, review, and inform innovation.3 Tools range in complexity from simple executive blogs to more robust portals where users can collaboratively access and analyze data sets.

Often, these newer forms of knowledge sharing require little additional investment, since the content is largely user generated and the tools rely mostly on existing applications and infrastructure. In fact, these tools usually augment existing transactional systems rather than replace them, thus increasing the value of IT investments while holding down costs. Since users often drive the development of these collaborative tools, strategies that complement users’ work practices and styles are most effective. Although such an endeavor is challenging, the payoff can be substantial.

 

Innovation is seldom neat, and these collaborative systems are no exception. Successful initiatives usually start as small side projects or tests that gain critical mass rapidly, often with little regard for corporate technology or security standards. IT leaders can play a critical role by selecting and validating platforms, setting policies, and promoting capabilities to potential participants. Because Enabling IT staff members already work within business units, they can help guide these projects, giving executives some degree of control and assurance on compliance with critical security and data standards. The result is a smoother transition to the Factory IT environment when the systems reach maturity (see sidebar “Enabling IT: Bringing it together”).

While leading companies may implement these principles differently based on their business needs and culture, we believe there is no turning back. Factory IT’s potential to increase efficiency and reduce costs can finance the next wave of Enabling IT’s innovation. The combination of functional productivity and business value creation will likely be a major competitive differentiator; the first step in delivering this value is to ensure companies have the right leaders in place for each effort.

About the Authors

Roger Roberts is a principal in McKinsey’s Silicon Valley office, where Hugo Sarrazin is a director; Johnson Sikes is a consultant in the New York office.

Notes

1 The online survey was in the field in October 2010 and includes responses from 864 IT and non-IT executives, from a range of industries, regions, and company sizes.

2 Michael Chui, Andy Miller, and Roger P. Roberts, “Six ways to make Web 2.0 work,” mckinseyquarterly.com, February 2009.

3 Bradford C. Johnson, James M. Manyika, and Lareina A. Yee, “The next revolution in interactions,” mckinseyquarterly.com, November 2005.

Recommend (74)
  • 31 MARCH 2011
    Haibo Hu
    Lead Domain Architect
    LFG
    Chicago, IL USA

    In Chinese, computer is called “Dian Nao”, which literally means “Electrical Brain”. It is largely true that a computer is an extension of a human brain....

    .
    Haibo Hu
    Lead Domain Architect
    LFG
    Chicago, IL USA

    In Chinese, computer is called “Dian Nao”, which literally means “Electrical Brain”. It is largely true that a computer is an extension of a human brain. Interestingly, IT has not been successful in mimicking the complete sphere of human brain: the left side of brain and the right side of brain. The authors here provide some insights of how to leverage and address both of them: Factory IT - the left side of brain; Enabling IT - the right side of brain. To this end, I would applaud their perspectives. Keep trying! IT will become a true profession to be treated as equally as other engineering fields.

    .
  • 9 FEBRUARY 2011
    Artie Debidien
    Director ICT and Operations
    New Venture Financial Services Company
    Netherlands

    I agree with Jaspal. Interesting to see how IT Factory challenges—i.e. managing underlying data, legal jurisdiction, compliance, and operational risk processes—will develop...

    .
    Artie Debidien
    Director ICT and Operations
    New Venture Financial Services Company
    Netherlands

    I agree with Jaspal. Interesting to see how IT Factory challenges—i.e. managing underlying data, legal jurisdiction, compliance, and operational risk processes—will develop in the coming period, especially for the financial services industry regulated by law and institutions. Virtual and cloud technology enables you to benefit more from economies of scale in outsourced environments. Not being able to mitigate the risk and impact of no tangible or dedicated resources at all (especially data stores and control of server access and from a security perspective) will force us to still make use of partially non flexible IT factories. Unfortunately...

    .
  • 4 FEBRUARY 2011
    Sharad Gupta
    Business Architect
    San Ramon, CA USA

    An interesting article. I would argue, though, that agile development is more pertinent and applicable to enabling IT....

    .
    Sharad Gupta
    Business Architect
    San Ramon, CA USA

    An interesting article. I would argue, though, that agile development is more pertinent and applicable to enabling IT. The “enabling IT” component requires a lot of experimentation and harnessing of information for better collaboration, decision-making, customization, etcetera.

    .
  • 1 FEBRUARY 2011
    Udayan Banerjee
    CTO
    NIIT Technologies
    Bangalore India

    We should be very cautious before borrowing idea from factories. We need to follow two guidelines: 1. Reject all ideas which are derived or borrowed for the purpose of managing predictable processes....

    .
    Udayan Banerjee
    CTO
    NIIT Technologies
    Bangalore India

    We should be very cautious before borrowing idea from factories. We need to follow two guidelines:
    1. Reject all ideas which are derived or borrowed for the purpose of managing predictable processes.
    2. Accept all ideas which help you to deal with unknown and uncertainty.

    .
  • 8 JANUARY 2011
    Henrik Klagges
    Managing Partner
    TNG Technology Consulting
    Munich, Germany

    I am surprised that agile software development methods are grouped under the Factory IT section in the article....

    .
    Henrik Klagges
    Managing Partner
    TNG Technology Consulting
    Munich, Germany

    I am surprised that agile software development methods are grouped under the Factory IT section in the article. Agile methods such as Scrum are practically de rigeur for fast, experimental, innovation-seeking Enabling IT. If non-agile methods retain their right-to-exist at all, it is in Factory IT settings.

    .
  • 5 JANUARY 2011
    Dr Mike Waterston
    Waterstons Ltd
    Durham, UK

    I find it interesting that most discussion about improving the value derived from IT focusses on the technology and fails to address the issues of how to align IT resources to create strategic business advantage....

    .
    Dr Mike Waterston
    Waterstons Ltd
    Durham, UK

    I find it interesting that most discussion about improving the value derived from IT focusses on the technology and fails to address the issues of how to align IT resources to create strategic business advantage. I have experienced huge problems which have arisen from basic communications and language issues that have isolated IT staff from the real world and effectively prevented them from adding value. IT people need to address the simple issue of how to engage meaningfully with their business colleagues and learn how to offer real solutions to real problems and earn the confidence of their colleagues. Most business people don’t care a jot about the cloud, they just want to see initiatives that will raise productivity and quality, encourage team work, and give them accurate control information from which they can manage their business effectively. If this can be accomplished by an IT function that guarantees high uptime, which is a sensible proportion of total costs and looks after critical data then thats just perfect.

    Is it really that difficult?

    .
  • 4 JANUARY 2011
    Michael Lurie
    Founder and CEO
    Blue Mine Group
    San Diego, CA USA

    ...It would great to explore further the relationship between the two, how Factory IT can better understand and serve Enabling IT, and how Enabling IT should both leverage and contribute to Factory IT.

    .
    Michael Lurie
    Founder and CEO
    Blue Mine Group
    San Diego, CA USA

    Great article, and a good example of the emerging 21st century organization comprising central resource, process, and product platform businesses (Factory IT in this example) enabling and serving market-focused solution businesses (Enabling IT). It would great to explore further the relationship between the two, how Factory IT can better understand and serve Enabling IT, and how Enabling IT should both leverage and contribute to Factory IT.

    .
  • 23 DECEMBER 2010
    Philip Straw
    Consultant
    IBM
    London, UK

    ...I agree that the operating model for the Enabling IT organisation requires a more customer intimate relationship with the business while at the same time bringing technology insight, more likely delivered by cross IT/business teams...

    .
    Philip Straw
    Consultant
    IBM
    London, UK

    A challenge for business is to understand what model is suited to their business/market/customers—is the business’ view of IT consistent with IT’s view of how they deliver value to the organisation?

    I agree that the operating model for the Enabling IT organisation requires a more customer intimate relationship with the business while at the same time bringing technology insight, more likely delivered by cross IT/business teams (virtual teams/peer groups - and Web 2.0 tools can help here).

    However one area that can sometimes cause a breakdown is the governance of the demands of multiple lines of business and how the “new enabling IT” is integrated into the factory.

    .
  • 16 DECEMBER 2010
    Steve Gorton
    Managing Director
    Enabling Development
    UK

    My experience working with big organisations’ CIOs and their teams suggests there are some key messages:...Help the leadership (initially) to stand back and embrace balcony as well as dance floor thinking...

    .
    Steve Gorton
    Managing Director
    Enabling Development
    UK

    I enjoyed this article which is essentially around getting people to think more strategically and at a higher operational level about IT—be they in IT or other organisational functions.

    My experience working with big organisations’ CIOs and their teams suggests there are some key messages:

    a) Concentrate on business pull rather than technology push
    b) Align your internal IT process with the customer need (internal and external customers)
    c) Check that your processes are fit for purpose, or indeed ensure that a process exists—e.g. ITIL for service management
    d) Help the leadership (initially) to stand back and embrace balcony as well as dance floor thinking, i.e., really consider the strategic context as well as the operational and tactical processes.

    In other words, help them to think and then think differently.

    Get these right and the proven opportunity for £, $, € millions of return on investment.

    .
  • 9 DECEMBER 2010
    Steven Weiss
    chairman
    disregardpreviousinstructions
    St.Louis, MO USA

    ...The only way to create a series of overlapping competitive advantages on the fly is through the management of IT....

    .
    Steven Weiss
    chairman
    disregardpreviousinstructions
    St.Louis, MO USA

    In a hyper-competitive market the winners and losers will be determined by the utilization of IT in every sector of an enterprise. The only way to create a series of overlapping competitive advantages on the fly is through the management of IT. Factory IT is a price of entry and there will be many competitors who play the game. IT is a critical asset which much be grown day in and day out.

    .
  • 6 DECEMBER 2010
    Duane Lamoureux
    Managing Principal
    Lamoureux Consulting, LLC
    Walnut Creek, CA USA

    ...I’ve been advising clients with this type of approach over the past few years as I think it makes sense given IT’s maturation and business demands....

    .
    Duane Lamoureux
    Managing Principal
    Lamoureux Consulting, LLC
    Walnut Creek, CA USA

    I believe the concept behind this article is on point, splitting IT into “factory style productivity” and “nimble, innovative” approaches (using the authors’ terminology). I’ve been advising clients with this type of approach over the past few years as I think it makes sense given IT’s maturation and business demands. I see cloud computing, agile development, etcetera, as tools that may be used (along with others) in given situations.

    .
  • 2 DECEMBER 2010
    Anders Mikkelsen
    Managing Director
    Berlin Pacific
    New York NY, USA

    ...Interestingly, many IT departments have problems aligning their own spending on just their vendors. It is ironic that IT departments have network management systems without corresponding network cost management systems...

    .
    Anders Mikkelsen
    Managing Director
    Berlin Pacific
    New York NY, USA

    Shaashi’s comment about pull-based resource management reminds me of Theory of Constraints solutions like Constraints Management Group for manufacturing.

    Most firms tend to spend most of their money on ‘entitlements,’ keeping things running. New trends create the opportunity to more efficiently manage and supply infrastucture, and for IT to focus on serving the business and aligning IT with business and enabling business processes.

    Interestingly, many IT departments have problems aligning their own spending on just their vendors. It is ironic that IT departments have network management systems without corresponding network cost management systems to give visibility. (Look up ‘Visibility - Key to Network Cost Management’ for more—even phone companies have this issue.) We’ve seen this consistently with spending on vendor services like support and maintenance contracts with OEMs, and wireless and wireline voice and data services. However, non-IT vendor spend for recurring services has similar problems of insufficient visibility into costs, so this isn’t an isolated problem.

    .
  • 2 DECEMBER 2010
    Denis Thiercelin
    Project Auditor
    Alstom
    Paris France

    ...if this statement is supported by a thorough savings-quantified business case, even the most reluctant responsible will pave the way, seeing a personal opportunity to join the new making-money initiative.

    .
    Denis Thiercelin
    Project Auditor
    Alstom
    Paris France

    This overview of current trends in the IT management at the service of core business brings value by its exhaustiveness as well as by the dissemination of appropriate vocabulary, so useful to discuss such delicate matters in uncharted territories.

    Indeed, resolving the equation of on-going innovation brought by IT systems with the urgent need to streamline, harmonize, and pilot this new dematerialized infrastructure looks often so impossible to solve that we understand the current mindset of executives in charge who wait until IT gets mature and stable by itself (if it will ever be so, given the current constant structural changes) before investing money and efforts in this crusade. Unfortunately in the meantime, they miss the no-limits power of IT tools generating new core-business opportunities at an increasingly faster pace than any other infrastructures before, as illustrated by the several examples mentioned in this article.

    One of the numerous problems the IT executives face is to convince others internally on the rationales of their endeavor. On the CEO side, significant resources are needed for the management of IT systems to be unleashed. On the operatives side, various impacted players in large corporations have the power to hamper IT projects. In that specific challenge, the business case is key and I would add to the paragraph ‘Holistic business-cases’ the third benefit of empowering their mandate. Indeed a figures-backed business case gives them the finance clearance towards internal players, often averse to change (both CEO and operatives, by the way). The document basically tells them “If we do that, we make money”. And if this statement is supported by a thorough savings-quantified business case, even the most reluctant responsible will pave the way, seeing a personal opportunity to join the new making-money initiative.

    .
  • 2 DECEMBER 2010
    Myles Vogel
    Practioneer faculty
    Johns Hopkins Carey Business School
    Baltimore, MD USA

    ...In these organizations, IT drives competitive advantage by lowering the cost of the internal value chain. These IT forces drive the internal IT capabilities engine that lowers cost and improves efficiencies....

    .
    Myles Vogel
    Practioneer faculty
    Johns Hopkins Carey Business School
    Baltimore, MD USA

    I agree with and teach many of the concepts you discuss in this article. But I believe there are IT organizations that “drive” the business which goes beyond enabling. In these organizations, IT drives competitive advantage by lowering the cost of the internal value chain. These IT forces drive the internal IT capabilities engine that lowers cost and improves efficiencies. These capabilities are exposed to the customer, supplier, and competitors in the way of competencies which generate revenue as they are viewed as competitive advantage by the customer. This focus leads to competitive advantage and increased profitability.

    .
  • 2 DECEMBER 2010
    Jaspal Dhalliwal
    Cloud and Virtual Datacenter Practice Consultant
    EMC
    Berlin, Germany

    ...The IT Factory is already there. However, unique challenges related to managing the underlying data, including legal jurisdiction and compliance, are still developing. These differentiate the Cloud from a typical IT factory perhaps.

    .
    Jaspal Dhalliwal
    Cloud and Virtual Datacenter Practice Consultant
    EMC
    Berlin, Germany

    The Acadia VBlock construct is essentially the ‘Factory IT’ form of the traditional datacenter. It essentially allows typical factory-based efficiency to be applied in the form of policies such that there is a strong cost containment factor and a direct link of spending and performance per service provisioned.

    That this needs to be monitored on an ongoing basis is beyond dispute. However, through integration of the traditional datacenter elements, best practice, ITIL standardization, and of course the obvious allure of high-end virtualization, companies are able to align business needs and the IT spend needed to deliver the capabilities supporting business strategy.

    Standardization does not necessarily mean no customization. Rather, that is left to the imagination of the developers for software products, whilst the underlying infrastructure as encapsulated in the VBlock allows the required service levels to be respected. This is the freedom of choice that is inherent in the Cloud.

    Indeed, the journey to the Cloud encapsulates this thinking implicitly. The ability to rapidly deliver IT resources is a prime feature of the decoupling of software and operating systems from the underlying hardware they operate upon—also known as, server/desktop/application virtualization.

    The IT Factory is already there. However, unique challenges related to managing the underlying data, including legal jurisdiction and compliance, are still developing. These differentiate the Cloud from a typical IT factory perhaps.

    .
  • 2 DECEMBER 2010
    Gregor Petri
    Sr. Director
    CA Technologies
    The Netherlands

    Interesting analysis of what is seemingly a dichotomy. I would suggest that taking a “Supply Chain approach” towards managing IT can reconcile these two....

    .
    Gregor Petri
    Sr. Director
    CA Technologies
    The Netherlands

    Interesting analysis of what is seemingly a dichotomy. I would suggest that taking a “Supply Chain approach” towards managing IT can reconcile these two. Such a Supply Chain approach enables IT to bond again with their users while at the same time preventing them from going “rogue,” a not inconsiderable danger or opportunity (depending on your point of view) in the age of cloud computing.

    .
  • 1 DECEMBER 2010
    Shashi Rai
    President
    Yaantrik, Inc.
    San Jose, CA USA

    I am glad to see this article, it’s a vindication of the resource management model called resource as a service (RaaS)....

    .
    Shashi Rai
    President
    Yaantrik, Inc.
    San Jose, CA USA

    I am glad to see this article, it’s a vindication of the resource management model called resource as a service (RaaS). The fundamental principal of RaaS is pull-based resource managment to increase resource utilization, reduce idle time, reduce duplication of skill sets, and increase resource turn (similar to inventory turn). The expected benefit in terms of cost is substantial.

    I strongly feel that the IT industry is at an inflexion point and needs a fundamental shift in the way resources and costs are managed, similar to the move to lean and JIT in the 1970s for manufacturing firm. With companies reducing IT spending due to the economic downturn and the repriortization of resources to high-growth emerging countries, it is imperative for IT spending to be optimised without impacting quality.

    The pull-based model is required for both client and IT service providers since both need to maximise their resource utilization.

    .
Submit Your Comments

The user information you enter into this form will not update your site profile. To update your profile, please visit your profile page.

Subject Reshaping IT management for turbulent times

*Required

We may publish your comments online and in the print edition of McKinsey Quarterly. Those chosen, which may be edited for length and clarity, will appear along with your name and details, but not your e-mail address. We will use your e-mail address only to send you a confirmation copy of your comments and to notify you if we publish them online.

We value your feedback and will consider it carefully. Nonetheless, we receive so many comments that we cannot acknowledge all of them.

See also:
Preview

Embed E-mail