The McKinsey Quarterly

  • Recommend (55)
  • Text Size
  • Print
  • Download PDF
  • Link to This

Memo to the CEO: Why we need an annual report for technology

The IT organization and the business units should be much more in tune. Here’s one way to make that happen.

To: The CEO
From: The CTO
Subject: Annual report for technology

At last week’s executive committee meeting, you made the point that our company’s business units and technology organization need to be much more in tune with each other. In this memo, I’d like to explain how we could take a joint step toward making that happen.

No one doubts that our company’s success depends on solid technology support. But everyone also believes that we can do a lot more to make technology serve the business units—for example, by deepening our insights into what customers need, integrating channels, speeding the delivery of services, and accelerating new-product development. We struggle to realize this potential.

The basic problem is a lack of shared understanding. Our business unit leaders have only a vague sense of the value the technology organization delivers: they just see bits and pieces and don’t seem to grasp the interdependencies. It’s understandable that they get upset when things go wrong, but it’s less understandable that they hesitate to invest time and energy to sponsor solutions. Our technology leaders, for their part, often fail to address issues in ways that businesspeople find meaningful and therefore lack credibility when they try to explain IT’s value to the business.

I’ve thought hard about how we could make more progress toward our goals. While I don’t claim to have the entire solution, I do have an idea that may bring us a big step closer. But in order for this solution to be successful, I will need your support and cosponsorship.

The idea is quite simple: you and I would jointly issue an annual report for technology—something analogous to the annual report for investors and the broader market. This document would not only provide a candid overview of our ability to extract business value from technology but also substantiate that analysis with hard metrics. We would share perspectives on the challenges of technology, convey our ideas about its role in our company, celebrate achievements, and articulate our plans and visions for the future.

To show that we are serious about bridging the gap between technology and the business units and to discourage people from seeing the report as an attempt by IT to plead its own case, it’s important that you and I issue the report jointly. Here’s how we could structure it.

CEO–CTO introduction

This opening section, framed as a letter-style executive summary, would introduce the idea behind the annual report for technology and the business rationale for issuing it: namely, to tell key stakeholders about technology’s performance over the past fiscal year, describe technology’s explicit contribution to meeting core business objectives, and explain the implicit value of the technology portfolio, along with our vision for the year ahead.

Supporting organizational agility

Technology underpins nearly every business process today, yet the connections aren’t always visible on the surface. This second section would provide stakeholders with a sort of anatomical chart of technology—a graphical representation illustrating where and how our company is using technology to support improvements and make us more agile.

Aligning technology with business strategy

We know how easy it is for the interests of business and technology to diverge unless they are linked correctly, with effective metrics. In this third section, we would use numbers and stories to share our ideas about how technology creates value. The following examples might help put our performance-measurement program in context.

The operational-improvement program the board approved at the start of the fiscal year incorporated superior responsiveness and superior decision making into the core of the company’s strategic mission. To clarify technology’s role in supporting it, technology partnered with lean-team colleagues across the business units to identify critical success factors and suitable metrics.

The 2008 annual report set several goals for increasing sales, speeding up time-to-market, and reducing costs. The following chart illustrates technology’s role in supporting those business goals.

Such hard performance metrics are important, but you and I know that stories often put facts in context and can make a message more memorable. Therefore, we might consider including one or two sidebars about customers and employees. Here are two examples.

Sidebar 1

The high-value customer John Doe of Premier Corporation is pleased that Bob Smith, his relationship manager at our company, no longer has to manage low-value clients and now devotes extra time to Premier and offers it many more innovative production ideas.

Sidebar 2

Erica Sanchez, the controller in our industrial metals group, describes how our technology group integrated a suite of customer-financing applications to ease reporting, facilitate loan decisions, and reduce data entry risk.

Plans to use technology in new ways

This section, outlining the strategic reach of our technology program for the coming year, would focus on the two business principles you emphasized at our annual shareholder meeting: customer centricity and operational simplicity. To remain realistic and on track, we will ground our promises in a performance-measurement framework similar to the one described earlier. The intent, as always, is to establish the connection between our corporate vision and technology-enabled execution.

Technology capability statement

While our technology capabilities have come a long way, we know that we have only begun to develop the ability to support a streamlined, customer-centric company. This section would quantitatively discuss the improvements (or deterioration) in our enterprise technology capabilities over the past year, highlight technology’s progress in helping the company differentiate itself from competitors, and note where we need to improve. The featured initiatives could include our experimental customer cocreation center and our trial technology rotation program, in which technology specialists spend time in groups serving high-value market segments to speed up the development of new offerings.

Technology capability balance sheet

This section would offer a quantitative market valuation of our total technology portfolio, including tangible assets (such as hardware, data center facilities, and other physical properties), as well as key intangible assets (for instance, patents and signature R&D). The intent is to demonstrate not only the shareholder value embedded in our technology portfolio but also its return on investment and performance on other core financial metrics. In this way, the company can hold technology’s long-run performance to the same high standards the rest of our business is required to meet. Complementing the numbers, you and I will jointly provide an interpretation of them and share our perspective on how to raise the bar in the coming year. Examples and anecdotes will make the numbers come alive in the minds of the company’s executives.

The annual report for technology will help the executive team to see the big technology picture, improve communication and collaboration between the leaders of the business units and the technology organization, and allow the company to realize much greater value from technology. It will provide a new framework for more effective operations and, ultimately, better growth prospects.

I’m eager to start on the report. Let’s discuss the idea soon.

About the Authors

Driek Desmet is a director in McKinsey’s Amsterdam office, and Tor Mesøy is a principal in the Oslo office.

Recommend (55)
  • 27 NOVEMBER 2009
    Sainath Nagarajan
    Managing Director
    www.obviousideas.com
    Watertown, MA USA

    ...for instance, we shifted from each engineering group reporting its detailed metrics on a HR system upgrade, to a consolidated report targeted at the HR executive showing how IT delivered value to the HR function, in terms of HR metrics.......

    .
    Sainath Nagarajan
    Managing Director
    www.obviousideas.com
    Watertown, MA USA

    Having led the strategic organization transformation of a 500-person global organization, I can attest to the value of business-oriented reporting. It is not easy, but definitely possible. For starters, engineers and technologists like ‘real problems that can be functionally decomposed and solved, with solid numbers to back it up’. Hence, we see literally hundreds of metrics that operate at a level of minutea that loses business relevance. Once we begin IT to look causal loops and how it influences the lives of its customers and customers’ customers, the kinds of measures and metrics are very different.

    I instituted a business-facing quarterly performance review that was actually read by the C-suite and senior execs. It had wins, work in progress, and misses. All the information was oriented towards business goals, business organization structure, and/or business outcomes. So, for instance, we shifted from each engineering group reporting its detailed metrics on a HR system upgrade, to a consolidated report targeted at the HR executive showing how IT delivered value to the HR function, in terms of HR metrics. In the bargain, yes, we lost a ton of IT specific metrics. The biggest change management piece was in convincing IT executives and managers that those metrics, while somehow important, were totally irrelevant for the business audience. Interestingly, just 2 quarters later, the 70 people leaders all started talking only in business terms. Just shifting the frame of reference in the quarterly and annual report changed organization behavior. Most fun, yet.

    .
  • 16 MAY 2009
    Luca Garlaschelli
    Chief Information Officer
    University of Bologna
    Italy

    I agree with the article, but in my experience the Balanced Scorecard approach gives a better idea of how ICT supports the business....

    .
    Luca Garlaschelli
    Chief Information Officer
    University of Bologna
    Italy

    I agree with the article, but in my experience the Balanced Scorecard approach gives a better idea of how ICT supports the business. I think ICT must speak the same language of the other functions and Balanced Scorecard could be this common language.

    .
  • 11 MAY 2009
    Severin de Wit
    Managing Consultant
    IPEG Consultancy B.V
    Netherlands

    Interesting reading, but one thing I think should be part of any technology report is an analysis of what the company does to create value from its intangibles...

    .
    Severin de Wit
    Managing Consultant
    IPEG Consultancy B.V
    Netherlands

    Interesting reading, but one thing I think should be part of any technology report is an analysis of what the company does to create value from its intangibles (technology present in the company) by using its intellectual property. Way too often we see companies with lovely products, an innovative approach, and smart marketing, but where IP awareness—let alone an IP strategy—is lacking. Result: under-utilization of the company’s intangibles and technology capabilites, making it prone to IP challenges from third parties and thus vulnerable towards competition. IP is a much under-valued aspect and unfortunately there is not enough attention paid to it in your generally interesting article.

    .
  • 8 MAY 2009
    Majid Iqbal
    Senior Director
    Gartner
    Arlington, VA USA

    Driek and Tor, great idea. I created something similar in April 2008 for a Fortune 50 client. I called it “Statement of Service Capability”....

    .
    Majid Iqbal
    Senior Director
    Gartner
    Arlington, VA USA

    Driek and Tor, great idea. I created something similar in April 2008 for a Fortune 50 client. I called it “Statement of Service Capability”. Business outcomes are mapped against items in a service catalog, and every quarter the CIO and business unit heads jointly sign off on a statement that reflects the level of support IT is providing against business outcomes (also catalogued). I provided a set of guidelines on how to create and maintain a statement for every business unit.

    .
Submit Your Comments

The user information you enter into this form will not update your site profile. To update your profile, please visit your profile page.

Subject Memo to the CEO: Why we need an annual report for technology

*Required

We may publish your comments online and in the print edition of McKinsey Quarterly. Those chosen, which may be edited for length and clarity, will appear along with your name and details, but not your e-mail address. We will use your e-mail address only to send you a confirmation copy of your comments and to notify you if we publish them online.

We value your feedback and will consider it carefully. Nonetheless, we receive so many comments that we cannot acknowledge all of them.

See also:
Preview

Embed E-mail